Tizimning ushbu imkoniyatidan foydalanish uchun Siz avtorizatsiya qilinishingiz kerak!
Ro‘yxatdan o‘tishni xohlaysizmi? Yoki tizimga o‘z loginingiz bilan kirasizmi?

Avtorizatsiya qilish Ro‘yxatdan o‘tish

There being cause, as specified in articles 20 and 21 of this Code, the judge, the public prosecutor, expert, specialist, secretary of the judicial session and interpreter shall be obliged to declare self-withdrawal. On the same grounds, their challenge may be declared by the persons participating in the case. A challenge to the public prosecutor, expert, specialist, secretary of the judicial session, interpreter may also be considered on the initiative of the court.
5) cases on corporate disputes, specified in article 30 of this Code, with the exception of labor disputes;
Cases specified in part one of this article shall be considered by economic courts in accordance with the general rules of economic proceedings, with distinctions, specified in chapters 8, 28 and 29 of this Code.
The court competence established in accordance with articles 33 and 34 of this Code may be changed under an agreement of the parties.
At the performing of the procedural actions specified in part one of this article, the judge assistant (senior judge assistant) shall act as the secretary of the court session.
The expert is obliged to: there are being grounds provided for in articles 20 and 21 of this Code, immediately withdraw; conduct a comprehensive and complete study of the objects of examination presented to him, to give a reasoned and objective written opinion on the questions posed to him; appear upon summons of the court for personal participation in the court session; give testimony about his expertise and answer additional questions to clarify his conclusion; not to disclose information that became known to him in connection with the performance of the expert examination; ensure the safety of the presented objects of examination and case materials; keep order during the court session.
The persons participating in the case shall be notified of the time and place of holding the court session in the manner prescribed by article 127 of this Code. However, their failure to appear shall not preclude the consideration of the issue of replacing the measure of securing the claim.
The persons participating in the case shall be notified of the time and place of holding the court session in the manner prescribed by article 127 of this Code. However, their failure to appear shall not preclude the consideration of the cancellation of measures of securing the claim.
1) item 1 of article 101 of this Code — until the entry into legal force of a judicial act of the relevant court or until the completion of investigative actions;
2) items 2 and 5 of article 101, items 3 and 4 of article 102 of this Code — until the elimination of the circumstances that served as the basis for the suspension of the proceedings;
3) items 3 and 4 of article 101 and item 2 of article 102 of this Code — until the determination of the legal successor of the person participating in the case, the appointment of a representative to the legally incapable person, state registration of the newly formed legal person;
31) item 6 of article 101 of this Code — until the end of the mediation procedure, but no more than sixty days;
4) item 1 of article 102 of this Code — until the receipt by the court of an expert opinion.
An amicable agreement approved by the court and which has not been executed voluntarily within the time limits specified by the agreement, shall be subject to enforcement according to the rules of section V of this Code on the basis of a writ of execution issued by the court at the petition of the person who entered into the amicable agreement, and with regards to the collection of the court expenses — at the initiative of the court.
Refusal to accept a statement on the ground that the stated demand is not provided for by article 135 of this Code shall not prevent the creditor from stating a claim on the same demand under general procedure.
The judge shall issue a ruling on the return of the statement on the issuance of a court order on the grounds provided by items 1 — 6 of part one of this article no later than five days from the date of receipt of the statement by the court, and on the grounds provided by item 7 of part one of this article — no later than the next day after the receipt of the statement on the return of the statement on the issuance of a court order.
The judge is entitled to accept to proceedings the statement of claim submitted without the observance of the requirements provided by items 1 and 4 of part one of article 151 of this Code, and initiate the case, if the statement of claim is accompanied by the relevant petitions for a deferral, installment plan of payment of the state duty or motion to call evidence that the plaintiff does not have and these petitions and motion have been satisfied.
Opinion of the judge on the satisfaction of the petition for acceptance of the statement of claim for proceedings submitted without the observance of the requirements provided by items 1 and 4 of part one of article 151 of this Code must have its rationale stated in the ruling on the acceptance of the statement of claim for proceedings.
In case of failure of the parties to appear, the judge shall take actions specified in parts one and two of article 163 of this Code. In this case, no minutes of the pre-trial session shall be drawn up.
The persons who are participating in the case but have failed to appear to the court session shall be notified on the time and place of holding a new court session in accordance with the procedure established by article 127 of this Code. The persons participating in the case who have appeared to the court session shall be notified against signed acknowledgement to be attached to the case materials.
 Comments by LexUz
 Comments by LexUz
 Comments by LexUz
 Comments by LexUz
 Comments by LexUz
 Comments by LexUz
In case of an audio or video recording of the court session, the minutes of the court session shall have a record only on the issues provided by items 1 — 4, 6 — 8, 11 of part two of this article, specify the time of starting and ending of explanations of the persons participating in the case, witness testimonies, oral explanations by experts of their conclusions, pleadings and opinion of the public prosecutor, and also a notice on using audio recording means at the court session. Electronic or other carriers of audio and video records shall be adducted to the minutes of the court session.
In the event that several related demands have been stated, one of which relates to the demands specified in part one of this article, and the others are not related to them, all demands shall be subject to consideration under general rules of adversary proceedings established by this Code.
The statement of claim on a corporate dispute shall be accompanied by the documents specified in article 151 of this Code, as well as a document confirming the state registration of a legal person and containing data about its location (postal address).
In case of non-compliance with the requirements of parts one and two of article 223 of this Code, the statement on cancellation of the award of a court of arbitration shall be subject to refusal from acceptance according to the rules prescribed by article 154 of this Code.
In case of violations of the requirements specified in part three of article 37 of this Code, in parts one, two, four and five of this article, the statement on cancellation of the award of the court of arbitration shall be, in accordance with the rules provided for by article 155 of this Code, returned to the person who has submitted it.
When considering the case in the court session, the economic court shall establish the presence or the absence of the grounds, provided for by article 226 of this Code, for the cancellation of the award of the court of arbitration through examining the evidence presented to the court in substantiation of the stated demands and objections.
In case of non-compliance with the requirements of part two of article 228 of this Code, as well as in case of refusal to restore the missed time limit provided for in part six of this article, the statement for issuance of the writ of execution for enforcement of the award of the court of arbitration shall be refused according to the rules provided in article 154 of this Code.
In case of failure to comply with the requirements provided in part four of article 37 of this Code, parts one, two, four and five of this article, as well as in the case of submitting the statement after the expiration of a six-month period and in case of absence of a petition for restoration of the missed time limit, the statement for issuance of the writ of execution for enforcement of the award of the court of arbitration shall be returned to the person who submitted it in accordance with the rules established by article 155 of this Code.
If in the proceedings of the economic court specified in part three of article 37 of this Code, there is a statement on cancellation of the award of the court of arbitration, the economic court which considers the statement for issuance of the writ of execution for enforcement of this award, on a petition of the debtor, may adjourn the consideration of the statement for issuance of the writ of execution for enforcement of the award of the court of arbitration.
A ruling of the economic court adopted in accordance with part one of this article may be appealed against (protested) in accordance with the procedure established by this Code.
The economic court of the Republic of Uzbekistan shall leave the statement of claim without consideration according to the rules established by chapter 10 of this Code if a foreign court is considering a case on the dispute between the same persons, on the same subject matter, and on the same grounds, provided that the consideration of the given case does not refer to the exclusive competence of the economic court of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
The economic court of the Republic of Uzbekistan shall terminate the proceedings of the case according to the rules established by chapter 11 of this Code if there is a judgment of a foreign court, which has entered into legal force, adopted on the dispute between the same persons, on the same subject matter, and on the same grounds, provided that the consideration of the given case does not refer to the exclusive competence of the economic court of the Republic of Uzbekistan or the said judgment is subject to recognition and enforcement in accordance with article 248 of this Code.
8) a properly certified translation of the documents specified in items 1 — 5 of this article into the state language, unless otherwise provided by an international treaty of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
8) a properly certified translation of the documents specified in items 1 — 5 of this article into the state language, unless otherwise provided by an international treaty of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
The persons participating in the case shall be notified on the time and place of holding the court session by the ruling of the economic court of the Republic of Uzbekistan in accordance to the procedure established article 127 of this Code. Non-appearance of the said persons properly informed on the time and place of holding the judicial session shall not preclude the consideration of the case.
At consideration of the case, the economic court of the Republic of Uzbekistan shall establish the circumstances provided for by articles 255 and 256 of this Code by examination of evidence of substantiation of the stated demands and objections submitted to the economic court of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
After elimination of the circumstances specified in part one of this article, the person who has submitted the complaint for appeal (protest) shall be entitled to submit to the court the complaint for appeal (protest) under general procedure.
After elimination of the circumstances specified in part one of this article, the person who has submitted the appeal (protest), is entitled to submit again the cassation appeal (protest) to the court under general procedure.
After elimination of the circumstances specified in items 1 and 2 of part one of this article, the person who has submitted the statement shall have the right to recourse again to the court with the statement.
The recoverer and debtor shall be notified of the time and place of holding the court session by the ruling of the court issued not later than five days from the day of the receipt of the statement, in the order prescribed by article 127 of this Code. Non-appearance of the mentioned persons properly notified of the time and place of holding the court session shall not preclude the consideration of the statement.
The recoverer and the debtor shall be notified of the time and place of holding the court session by a court ruling issued not later than five days from the day of the receipt of the statement, in the order prescribed by article 127 of this Code. Non-appearance of the mentioned persons properly informed of the time and place of holding the court session shall not preclude the consideration of the statement.

If an error is detected in the act, highlight and press Ctrl+Enter.

© State institution “The National center of legal information “Adolat” under the Ministry of justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan